Difference between revisions of "Category talk:People form groups"
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
-[[User:Kai|Kai]] 09:38, 17 February 2007 (PST) | -[[User:Kai|Kai]] 09:38, 17 February 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Truthfully, I had completely ''forgotten'' that ''Gaera Main Groups'' was there until today--I made this category because I thought there wasn't a category for the concept. ::cough:: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Today when I tripped over the other, I consolidated the two by the quickest route (GMG had two items in it). I like that this specifies that it's groups of people, as opposed to, say, collections of artifacts, murders of crows, etc., but, yeah. It's not the best category name in the world. Nor do I suspect people'd confuse it much with an explanation at the top of the category page. I wouldn't mind renaming it. Thoughts? --[[User:Pdrydia|Dia]] 14:44, 17 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 15:44, 17 February 2007
So why do we have this group instead of Category:Gaera Main Groups? It seems to serve more or less the same purpose. Was it to include groups and organizations from other settings?
-Kai 09:38, 17 February 2007 (PST)
Truthfully, I had completely forgotten that Gaera Main Groups was there until today--I made this category because I thought there wasn't a category for the concept. ::cough::
Today when I tripped over the other, I consolidated the two by the quickest route (GMG had two items in it). I like that this specifies that it's groups of people, as opposed to, say, collections of artifacts, murders of crows, etc., but, yeah. It's not the best category name in the world. Nor do I suspect people'd confuse it much with an explanation at the top of the category page. I wouldn't mind renaming it. Thoughts? --Dia 14:44, 17 February 2007 (PST)
